Time for another episode of The Monster Pod! In tonight's episode, we dive into Nightmare on Elm Street, the impact that Wes Craven has had on horror, and the underlying tones of Nightmare on Elm Street 2. Also, Lucas goes on a bit of a Subway rant...
Warning: There is adult language/content in the podcast. Of course, if you watch a lot of horror movies, you are probably ok with occasional swearing and adult content
The Monster Pod is myself, Lucas (of New Monster Project), and Tim (of Mass Listeria). Joining us tonight is Daniel (also of Mass Listeria). We hope that you enjoy our second episode and that we keep you coming back for more! The Monster Pod - horroring it up since 2015.
As I mentioned last week, after a month of watching and reviewing horror movies, I ended the month on an absolute high note. I watched some pretty great horror movies during October, but the highlight of the month (in regards to film) was definitely attending the Frightening Ass Film Festival in Chattanooga! Thanks to Daniel Guy and Tim Frady of masslisteriapodcast.com bringing me on board, I was able to meet some of the awesome people from Mise En Scenesters and the Chattanooga Film Fest who were responsible for putting on FAFF. They know how to put together a great lineup and I cannot wait to see what they have in store in the future! Even though I wasn't able to stay for the entire day, I did see some great local(ish) short films, a couple professionally made short films, an older 80s anthology, and a new anthology.
Local(ish) shorts: The Entrant (Sean Harrison Greer): This short is about a gym owner embroiled in a sexual scandal with one of his clients and the impact that it has on his marriage and his career. The story is told almost entirely through news stories providing narration. Of this five shorts, this one probably had the highest production quality. I enjoyed some of the psychological impacts of how the main character coped with loss. However, I was not a fan of the news stories serving as essentially the only dialogue driving the story. By using narration to tell what has happened, rather than just showing what happened, it does not give me time enough to be connected enough to the character to really care about what happens. The film was shot well - I just wish that more would have been invested into the characters.
Cold Shoulder (Joseph Heath): A woman brings home a necklace, but haunted by the feeling that someone is following her. The feeling of being followed intensifies as the power of the necklace grows. This was a very short and simple story. Not much backstory was given and there was no explanation given as to why things happened the way that they did. However, I think that it worked. By just picking up at a specific point in time and then ending with a cliffhanger, this forces the viewer to ask questions. I think that part of what makes a good film is the ability to keep people talking about it after. Some of the unanswered questions really lead to the increased mystery. Then again, some of it just leads to unanswered questions. (mintypineapple.com, twitter: @mintypineapple)
The Girl in the Photo (Sannah Parker): This was another short and simple story with the majority of the dialogue being news stories providing the narrations. As I mentioned above, I am not a fan of using news to tell the story. I would much rather have seen the events transpire, rather than just being told about them. That being said, the plot of this film had a very 70s feel - in a good way. You knew who the killer was going to be, so it was less about the surprise for the audience and more about the thrill of the chase. I just wish that there had been a bit more of the actual chase and, more specifically, more buildup leading to the chase. (instagram:@sannahmarie)
This is Hell (Chad Wilson): This was essentially The Excorcist, but with college kids/young adults. There were several things about this short that got a chuckle out of the audience. Unfortunately, (and I hate to say this) I honestly could not tell if the short was intended to be humorous or if the dialogue was just too cliched and over-acted. (https://www.youtube.com/user/krumpmaster4/featured)
Tailypo (Cameron McCasland): Of all of the local shorts, this one was definitely my favorite. This was the tale of a man and his dog living in the woods of Appalachia and their encounter with a woodland monster. The reason that this was my favorite was because it actually emphasized the character. His interactions with the dog felt genuine and gives an insight into who the character is. Even though I know that he is going to die at the end (he is the only character...of course he is going to die), I care enough about the character to where it still has an impact. My biggest critique of this short was that it went on a bit too long. Things should have ended the first time that the character goes back outside to investigate the sound. (cameronmccasland.com)
Professional shorts The Mill at Calder's End (Kevin McTurk): This short was about a curse that haunts a family and the journey one man must go on to try to end the curse. The entire movie was done with puppets and it was amazing! The classic feel of the story brought me in, but what really captivated me was the use of puppets. One of the reasons that I love movies is because of the imagination and sense of wonder that comes with creating reality from fantasy. The story might have brought me in, but it was definitely the artistry that kept me hooked! (www.thespiritcabinet.com, twitter: @spiritcabinet)
El Gigante (Gigi Saul Guerrero): The description that was given at FAFF was "Texas Chainsaw Massacre with luchadors." That is about as accurate as a description can get. I like to say that it is like Nacho Libre on the Scarecrow's nerve gas. There was a lot of gore crammed into a short amount of time. Also, even though no backstory was given on some of the characters, it was fairly easy to have a clear sense of what those characters were like. Of course, this was probably due in large part to playing off of some of the tropes set in movies such as TCM. El Gigante is in talks to be picked up as a feature length film. I'm interested to see how the expand the story. Specifically, I am curious about which character the story will revolve around. (www.luchagoreproductions.com, twitter: @horrorguerrero)
Feature Films: From a Whisper to a Scream (Jeff Burr): This was an 80s horror that was gruesomely fun and brought together so many different aspects that made 80s horror uncomfortably enjoyable to watch. Each of the shorts not only had gore, but also had some underlying tale or moral that helped to actually intensify the horror. As I have mentioned in previous reviews, just because a movie is startling does not mean that it lives up to "horror" status. For a movie to truly be horrific, it must play on underlying fears and taboos. And this movie was full of fears and taboos! From relationships that bordered on incest, necrophilia, immortality, suffering, and slavery, this movie most certainly gives the audience plenty to talk about well after the movie is over.
Tales of Halloween: This is another anthology, with each segment done by a different director. All of the stories are loosely tied together around one Halloween night in a suburban neighborhood. This was by far the most enjoyable movie of the day and probably one of the best horror anthologies that I have ever seen. It is by no means perfect, but it was about as good as an anthology can get! The stories were gory, fun, humorous, poignant, well-produced, well-acted, and just an all around good time. There were monster stories, aliens, backwoods murderers, demons, hellacious kids....really, practically all of the major types of horror stories were covered. Humor was infused throughout the movie, but not in a way that made the stories juvenile or condescending. Tales of Halloween is a horror movie for people who love horror and who realize that Halloween movies are supposed to not only be scary, but also a hell of a lot of fun. (talesofhalloweenmovie.com)
Unfortunately, I had to leave after Tales of Halloween was over. But, I hope that you enjoyed my reviews of what I was able to catch. I had an amazing time at the Frightening Ass Film Fest and it really was the best way that I could have started my Halloween this year. I cannot wait until next year!...hopefully I'll be able to stick around the entire day.
So, this officially concludes my Halloween Movie Month reviews for 2015. Be sure to check back soon for more reviews. In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here, on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and on facebook (www.facebook.com/thegargyle), and let me know what movies you'd like to see me review.
Also, be sure to check out Mass Listeria at masslisteriapodcast.com and follow on twitter @MassListeria, @Daniel_Guy, and @FradyTim.
One day, I came home from a very long day at work wanting nothing more than to just spend a relaxing night at home with my wife. Unfortunately, she was working that night and I knew that I was returning to an empty home. However, before she left for work, my amazing wife had strategically arranged a couple of my action figures (nothing dirty...just amusing). This inspired the creation of the resulting video, Retro and the Girl.
This is Halloween! This is Halloween! Well, yesterday was, anyway. After a month of watching and reviewing horror movies, I ended the month on an absolute high note. My Halloween Movie Month culminated in attending the Frightening Ass Film Festival in Chattanooga, thanks to Daniel Guy and Tim Frady bringing me on board with Mass Listeria. I saw some really amazing films and got to chat with with creator (Cameron McCasland) of one of the short films (Tailypo). The Frightening Ass Film Festival was a perfect way for me to start my Halloween! I was able to see some local short films, an older anthology with everything that made 80s horror so gruesomely fun, and a newer anthology that was about as good as an anthology can get!! Unfortunately, I was not able to stay for the entire day. But, I'm ok with that because it meant that I was able to dress up and celebrate Halloween with my amazing wife!
Sabretooth and Batgirl
Another Halloween has come and gone - and with it, another year of Halloween Movie Month. My reviews from the Frightening Ass Film Fest will be my final reviews to close out this year's Halloween Movie Month, so I will get them posted as soon as possible. I hope that everyone had an amazing October filled with scary movies and fun with friends. If you enjoyed any of my reviews for Halloween Movie Month, let me know. Now that October is over, I will be moving on to other reviews. So, let me know what movies you'd like to see me review (Halloween, or otherwise).
image by Daniel Guy of Mass Listeria
Thank you again to Daniel Guy and Tim Frady for making me a part of the Mass Listeria Podcast. Check out their rants and ravings at masslisteriapodcast.com. Our latest episode is things we love about fall, so it is a perfect transition from Halloween to Thanksgiving. Ok, maybe not perfect...but at least a fun transition.
Follow on Twitter at:
@GargyleReviews
@MassListeria
@Daniel_Guy
@FradyTim
I do not know if there is anyone out there who does not know the basic plot of A Nightmare on Elm Street. But, just in case...A Nightmare on Elm Street is about a serial killer, Freddy Krueger, who tortures and murders teens through their dreams.
A Nightmare on Elm Street is a horror classic from horror icon Wes Craven. Good horror movies have always had the lasting impact of the viewers being too scared to sleep after seeing them. Craven took this to the extreme by having a killer who actually killed his victims through their dreams. It had a tremendous impact on the horror genre and has spawned numerous sequels, spin-offs, and homages. The horrifying Freddy Krueger helped to launch Nightmare into its iconic status. Even those who have never seen Nightmare know who Freddy is and why they should be scared of him (despite the fact that Freddy was only on screen for about 7 minutes total throughout the entire movie)!
All of that being said, I am about to say something that I realize might cause my horror credibility to be decreased in the eyes of some horror fans....I do not find A Nightmare on Elm Street to be as amazing as everyone says it is. I think that it is a good movie. I enjoy it. And I get why it is so important and the impact that it had on the genre. But, when I hear most people talk about how absolutely amazing it is, I see things in a slightly different light.
Wes Craven has definitely had an impact on the horror genre and Nightmare helped to establish, and put twists on, some of the tropes of horror. But, part of the reason for my differing view is that I did not see Nightmare when I was young. The first time that I saw it was about 5 years ago. By that time, I had seen so many other horror movies and had been analyzing movies for a while. So, rather than being terrified by the thought of something killing me in my sleep, I viewed it too analytically. Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy the movie. There were definitely some scenes that were creepy. The underlying horror aspect of not being able to escape or defeat the monster chasing you is definitely terrifying. And, again, I get why it was so important. But, when it comes to the overall experience of the movie, it does not quite measure up to the decades of hype.
The musical score definitely had a lot of the characteristics that play on creepiness and uneasiness, setting the stage for haunting and terrifying scenes. However, the music is a bit too pervasive. Rather than setting the tone and then leaving you at the height of tension, it is almost like you get used to the music and forget that it is supposed to be creeping you out. I know that a lot of horror movies in the 80s relied very heavily on the music (especially one musical theme) to set the stage. But, having seen several movies recently where the horror of the music is more subtle, the score for Nightmare felt a little too constant.
There are the standard horror tropes: the first girl who dies is the one who just had sex, hearing a strange noise and going outside to investigate it, going "here, kitty kitty" when investigating the noise, and so on. However, what sets Nightmare aside is definitely the fact that Freddy is the embodiment of an inescapable fear. The idea of something being able to kill you in your dreams is definitely horrifying. How do you escape it? How do you defeat it? Just trying to avoid it is part of what makes your life hell. If you go to sleep, you die. But, if you don't go to sleep, you are in a constant state of exhausted fear. Most people feel safe at home and safe when they sleep. So, taking one of the times that you feel the most relaxed (and the most vulnerable) and turning it into where you die...that can definitely have some psychological impacts. This is especially true for the scene in the bathtub. That is one of the most terrifying scenes for me because the the character is the most vulnerable in the entire movie during that scene. She is naked with nowhere to go.
While the idea behind Freddy is absolutely terrifying, sometimes the execution is lacking for me. Part of the fun and the horror of Freddy is the cat and mouse game that he plays with his victims. But, for most of the movie, I feel like there is too much mouse with not enough cat. When you first see Freddy, the elongated arms are pretty creepy because it is subtle enough that you are not sure if it is just your mind playing tricks on you or if it is an unnatural ability. But for the most part, it feels like there isn't enough of the terrifying cat, and then a sudden kill. Rather than like most movies that have too much buildup with no real payoff, I feel like Nightmare doesn't have enough buildup.
Rating and Recommendation: After watching it again, I still only would give A Nightmare on Elm Street 3.5/5. I like it. I understand why it is so important. There are some things that are done very well. But, it just does not blow me away. I want to like it more than I do, I really do. I want to think that it is more amazing than it is. But, I just do not find it as amazing as other people do. There are things about it that are definitely creepy. The overall theme of not being safe in your own home or when asleep, and not being able to escape something chasing you, that is absolutely terrifying. But, overall, I feel as though the conceptualization is much better than the execution. Nightmare is a classic and an icon in the horror genre, so it is certainly a must see. But, the legacy of the movie is better than the actual movie itself.
There is a lot more that I could say about Nightmare, and in greater depth, but I will either save that for other posts about specific aspects, or I will address it on The Monster Pod.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Curse of the Swamp Creature is about a mad scientist performing experiments on people in an attempt to create a more evolved creature to do his bidding. The doctor also has a swimming pool full of alligators where he disposes of the failed experimental creatures.
If the brief synopsis and cover picture are not telling enough, this is an absolutely terrible movie. But, the question is "what kind of terrible is it?" Is it the kind of terrible that is almost painful to watch? Is it the kind of terrible that is so bad it's good? Is it the kind of terrible that you have such low expectations that you actually end up being pleasantly surprised by it?
From the very beginning, Curse of the Swamp Creature is pretty fantastically terrible. There is incredibly cheesy acting, poor video quality, minor voodoo subplot, loose plot, loose transitions, and skinny mad scientist with a deep "ominous" voice. However, because all of this terribleness is captured in the mid 60s, there is something endearing about it. Each decade has it's own brand of terrible movies, but there is just something about late 60s/early 70s terrible movies that just makes them so much more fun than recent terrible movies.
While there is the endearing aspect of 60s B-movies, that is not the final verdict. This movie is called Curse of the Swamp Creature, but until the very end of the movie, you really only ever see the hand of the creature (with good reason...that costume is comically terrible). Even the dead, rejected experiments are thrown into the gator pit wrapped in a white sheet so that you do not see them. If there had been more cheesy horror, it might have been worth multiple viewings. But, as it is, this movie feels like it is all set-up without any payoff. There is a sense that this movie would be more on the horror side, as opposed to the sci-fi side of things, but there are still a lot of classic sci-fi aspects. This movie is somewhere between horror and sci-fi, but without ever really fitting into either. There are some movies that are able to walk that balance in a way that breaks down genre walls. However, this is not one of those movies.
Rating and Recommendation: 1.5/5. Curse of the Swamp Creature started out with an abundance of (terrible) potential, but it never really went anywhere. There is over an hour of act one and then about 15 minutes total of acts two through five. For the general audience, this one is a definite pass. However, there is a caveat. I watched a lot of Mystery Science Theater 3000 growing up, so I have a fondness for terrible movies. There is something that can be a lot of fun about terrible movies, especially when watching with friends with whom you can joke throughout the movie. So, if you are like me and enjoy riffing movies, then this one is worth adding to a riff list. Definitely not worth spending money on - but you can find the entire movie (at the time of this review, at least) on YouTube.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Proteus is about a group of drug smugglers who board an oil rig after their yacht explodes. Once on the oil rig, they discover that it is a secret base of horrifying experiments.
Proteus is a terrible B-movie and that is made abundantly clear within the first 3 minutes. Terrible acting. Horrible sound mixing. Plot holes. Scenes jump around without segue or explanation. Characters know how to do things without any logical explanation for their knowledge. There are scenes that are obviously rip-offs of other movies (specifically, the mess-hall scene from Alien). Inconsistent physics of when/how people get hurt. Pretty much all of the things that you would expect from a crappy monster B-movie from the mid-90s. The movie is so bad that it is almost funny enough on its own. Almost. But, it is primarily the kind of movie that you need to watch with friends so that you can riff it.
Outside of the ridiculous factor, it's actually not a completely horrible movie. Obviously, there are so many things that make it atrocious. However, at its core, it's a fun little monster movie on a remote island - in this case, the island just happens to be an oil rig. It's just hard to get past all of the faults and truly enjoy it as a good movie. All of that being said, if you can get past some of the initial things that make this movie hard to watch, it starts just being ridiculous in a fun way. One of my favorite lines from the movie: "maybe after you blew it up it crawled into the ventilation system and died." My other favorite line: "you're a f***ing fish with a drug habit!"
Rating and Recommendation: 2/5. Taking everything into account, it actually ended up being a better B-movie, sci-fi, monster flick than what I initially expected. You just have to get past the horrible (horrible) first half. I think that it works best as riffing fodder, but there are times when it is enjoyable in it's own right. Not worth buying. Not especially worth seeking out. But, if you are with friends and one of them suggests you watch it, it won't be the worst decision of your life. Just make sure that they are ok with jokes being made during the movie.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Darkroom is about a young woman, Michelle (Kaylee DeFer), who takes a job that is referred to her by her counselor and is subsequently kidnapped and trapped in a mansion where a disturbed family "purges" her of her sins.
Darkroom feels like a pseudo-Saw meets House of Whipcord style movie. It is a standard "torture young women for being evil," similar to the kind that were prevalent in the 70s and 80s. While many movies of this type that came out in the 70s were notable due to their shock value, Darkroom did not live up to the standards of its inspiration. You would think that a hyper-religious family torturing women for sexual impurity would have more scenes of gore or shock value. However, for the vast majority of Darkroom, I was just bored.
It starts out with non-linear storytelling, but it feels more like scattered ramblings than intentional decisions. There is a minor character that is introduced and killed almost instantly. If the character had been kept around, hearing her tortured could have had a much stronger psychological impact on Michelle. That character is not the only one that dies quickly. If the family is killing off the women so quickly, rather than torturing them with the delusion of "purging" their sins, then why even bother kidnapping them and going through some of the ritual?
Darkroom has a very small cast, so there might have been limitations to what they thought they could do. But, they could have done so much more with what they had available! There was nothing about any of the characters that made them relatable or likeable. There were times when I thought that the characters approached likeability, but then they quickly did something that made me say "nope...still don't care at all about what happens to them."
Rating and Recommendation: 1.5/5. Pass. There wasn't anything that I especially hated about Darkroom...I was just bored by it. I think that there was potential for it to be pretty interesting, but they went in the wrong direction. If the story had followed the family and the trauma that they experienced, then that could have been pretty interesting. It also could have made at least one of the characters relatable. The movie starts with the delusion of the youngest brother and it ends with old home footage of the family being happy and playing in the courtyard of the mansion. If they had just focused on the youngest brother, they might have actually made him an interesting character. As it is, everything jumped around and was too disjointed. There was no heart anywhere in the movie to make me care about anything that was happening to any of them.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Along with watching and reviewing horror movies on a (mostly) nightly basis, I also started working on a horror podcast called The Monster Pod with my friends Lucas (of New Monster Project) and Tim (of Mass Listeria). We have our first episode posted (in which we talk about Halloween, what actually scares us, and some in-depth conversation about the differences between Carpenter's and Zombie's Halloween) and we have plans for plenty more! If you've been enjoying my reviews, give The Monster Pod a listen.
Warning: There is adult language in the podcast. Of course, if you watch a lot of horror movies, you are probably ok with occasional swearing and adult content.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month. And be sure to check back on The Monster Pod at themonsterpod.blogspot.com for more in-depth conversations about horror.
Re-Animator is about a medical student, Herbert West (played by Jeffrey Combs) who is fascinated (if not obsessed) with finding the scientific answer to re-animating dead tissue. West believes that he has found the correct formula for a serum to bring the dead back to life, but there are still a few kinks to work out.
I hate to admit it, but this is the first time that I have ever seen Re-Animator. Aside from knowing that it is a cult classic, the setting, tone, acting, etc. have a cult-classic feel right from the beginning. It does not take long for there to be gore, mad scientists, and exploding body parts. While the effects and acting were pretty cheesy, there is just something about movies from the 70s and 80s that feel so much more real. Maybe "real" isn't the best word...but, at least more genuine. Even when doing a schlocky comedy horror, the actors still portray the roles with conviction.
Re-Animator is one of those movies that knows the horror tropes, when to use them, when to give a new take on them, and how to do them appropriately. For example, most horror movies have the "here kitty, kitty" bit where there is a strange noise and the characters go out in search of the source of the noise, hoping that it was just a cat in the alley. In Re-Animator, there is still a "here kitty, kitty" scene, but it is when they are actually looking for the cat because they realize that they have not heard from it in a while. It's just a nice little twist that a lack of noise is what prompted the scene, rather than a startling noise.
Another thing that I love about this movie is that it is a horror comedy that actually gets the horror aspect and the comedy aspects right. The music, though repetitive, does well at setting the appropriately creepy mood. There are plenty of gory, gruesome, creepy scenes. But, amidst those scenes, there is very dry humor. The humor is done well in that it gets me to laugh (at the very least, chuckle) without completely breaking away from the scene. Too many horror comedies make the mistake of either focusing too much on one aspect while the other withers, or having the horror and comedy completely separate from each other.
The plot is not really anything new - bringing back the dead and the search for immortality. While the general plot might be familiar, it is done very well and I actually care about the characters. Also, the two main characters are actually complex. Rather than just being straightforward "good guys," they each have their flaws and their moments of compassion. This movie has a similar type of fright as a classic sci-fi mad scientist, but with the "horror" factor of mortality and what it means to actually be alive. I especially appreciated the way in which people who were brought back from the dead were presented as being more animalistic monsters. Is this because there is no soul to keep things in check? Is it just the reanimation of the biological drives? Or would bringing someone back from the dead bring their soul back too? While watching Re-Animator, I found myself thinking about what it is to be human and what it means to be truly alive. I pondered why the search for immortality leads to so many problems. While it might not have necessarily been the intention of the movie bring up these questions, I think that there is great potential for very interesting conversations brought up by the movie (but outside of just talking about the film).
Rating and Recommendation: 4/5. I absolutely loved this movie!! I am not necessarily saying that the quality of the movie is better than other movies that I have seen, but I am saying that Re-Animator delivered in pretty much all of the ways that I wanted it to. It is exactly what a cult classic should be! It had its shortcomings, but overall it was incredibly enjoyable to watch. This one is absolutely a must see! It is currently available on Netflix instant, but I enjoyed it enough that I will still probably buy a copy to add to my personal library. It should be noted that there is gore, swearing, nudity, and plenty of other things that make this movie exceedingly not suitable for kids.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Leprechaun is about a family that moves to a cabin in a small town in North Dakota. While fixing up the cabin with some local help, they unwittingly release a leprechaun (played by Warwick Davis) trapped in the basement that goes on a murderous quest to get back his pot of gold.
There were so many things that made this movie so terrible. The movie starts off with a portrayal of leprechauns that is so overly stereotyped that I halfway expected Warwick Davis to say "they'll never get me lucky charms!" In fact, the movie has several bad Irish stereotypes. I think that this is especially annoying because around St. Patty's day, I get sick of hearing everyone do horrible fake Irish accents all day. There is no explanation to some of the things that happen and the characters all make so many terrible decisions. Some of the deaths are just ridiculous (the leprechaun kills one person by jumping on them repeatedly with a pogo-stick). The "romance" between the jock and the flirt all takes place in the span of about a day. However, in re-watching it, there is something that I did not catch the first time I saw it...
Leprechaun was essentially a "cabin in the woods" movie. I didn't realize it when I was younger because I had not seen that many horror movies at the time. But, going back and re-watching it, I realized that it hits all the notes of a standard cabin in the woods. First of all, the house that the family buys is a cabin that is, essentially, in the woods (not quite as remote as most cabin movies). Secondly, the cast of characters includes the jock, the flirt, the virgin, and the stoner. My favorite thing about the "stoner" character is that it is portrayed by a kid. The kid does not actually do drugs, but his character is definitely that of the stoner. Thirdly, the monster is released when someone finds something in the basement that summons the character and only something very specific can defeat the monster.
Rating and Recommendation: In terms of quality, Leprechaun is pushing it to get a 2/5. It's not quite to the point of being "so bad it's good," but it's almost there. It is comically bad. The type of movie that needs to be on Comedy Central during October (and probably March too). But, it's not quite to the point of being so amazingly bad that it is an essential "must see" (like Troll 2). There is no actual merit to the film in terms of acting, special effects, plot, or really any other aspect that is part of a good movie. I think that it was intentionally supposed to be more on the comedic side of bad (at least, with some scenes, I hope that is what they were going for) - but, it's not like I was laughing out loud at any particular scene. Despite all of that, it is still enjoyable to watch, especially when watching it with friends who can add to the humor by riffing it, or by watching it with people who love horror and can deconstruct the cabin in the woods aspect of Leprechaun.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Twixt is about a faltering author (Val Kilmer) who is stuck in a rut and looking for inspiration for his next book. While on a book tour promoting his current book, one of his stops is a small town where he becomes embroiled in a murder mystery and a sinister history of the town.
Twixt starts with shots of the town and narration giving some of the history that has the town enveloped in ghost stories - a serial killing, a haunted bell tower, devil-worshiping teenagers, a haunted hotel, and so on. I really enjoyed the opening sequence because I think that the narration helped to give the story more of a classic horror feel. Of course, it helped that the narrator was Tom Waits.
Following the opening sequence, I was mostly disappointed in the movie. It is described on Netflix as a "gothic horror" directed by Francis Ford Coppola. From that alone, the movie should have been amazing. However, it failed to impress me. There were a few scenes that I really enjoyed: Val Kilmer drinking and writing in his hotel room was amusing, the use of color in the "dream" sequences was interesting, and there are a couple scenes that were genuinely creepy and extremely well executed. But, outside of those scenes, the overall movie was underwhelming.
I think that one of the things that was most frustrating was that Coppola could have done so much more with it to make it a stand-out gothic horror in the midst of modern gore. There were a lot of the right elements and it was being told in a way that was definitely unique, but I never really felt like those elements went anywhere or were fully actualized. All that being said, that might have actually been part of the point. The story is about an author that keeps writing the same type of story over and over again. So, maybe the setting (and the horror tropes that were never fully actualized) was there to help solidify the tone of outplayed stereotypes??
I think that one of the biggest problems was that I went into Twixt under the impression that it was a horror movie. Wanting (and expecting) horror, Twixt did not quite satisfy my needs. It felt more like a slightly offbeat comedy that drew heavily from literary inspiration with a dash of horror. If I was doing an Art House month, I think that I actually would have enjoyed it a lot more. Overall, it was not a bad movie - it just was not an appropriate movie to help set the mood for Halloween. After watching the movie, I did a little (admittedly, very little) research into it. Having done so, I have more of an appreciation for some of the artistic decisions. But that's just it...it's more of an artistic movie than a horror movie. That is not to say that horror movies cannot be artistic or that artistic movies cannot be terrifying (The House of the Devil comes immediately to mind - check out my review to see why). However, I feel as though Twixt stays too far on the artistic side to be a fully enjoyable horror movie.
Rating and Recommendation: 2/5. For Halloween Movie Month, Twixt is a pass as it will fail to satisfy your horror needs. However, if you are in the mood for an art house movie with just a dash of horror, Twixt is worth checking out. It will not be the most amazing movie that you have ever seen, but there will be some aspects that will be enjoyable/analyzable for those of you who study film. It's all about the expectations and what kind of movie you are in the mood to see.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Tonight was a pretty great night. My wife and I got together with a few of our friends from New Monster Network and we sat around a fire, made s'mores, shared stories and laughter, and watched Rocky Horror Picture Show. The weather today was absolutely amazing and it was a perfect night to sit around a fire and watch a movie with friends. Rocky Horror Picture Show is practically a Halloween tradition for me and my wife and we always watch it at least once around Halloween. But, it is definitely a movie that is more enjoyable when watching it with a group of friends. I included it a few years ago in my list of countdown recommendations for movies to watch in the last few days leading up to Halloween, and I still think that it's a great one for a fun night in preparation for Halloween.
Even though it is still almost two weeks until Halloween, tonight served as a snapshot of one of the reasons that I love Halloween so much. Halloween started out as a night to honor the deceased and to celebrate the living. Halloween has always been about fun and about connecting with others. Yes, there are scary stories and costumes and candy. But, when you think back on your favorite Halloweens, I am willing to bet that you always remember who you were with and not what sweets you had or even what costumes you wore. And tonight, sitting around a fire, talking those who have passed and new lives that have entered our world, all while Tim Curry sings "Sweet Transvestite"...well, it just really captured a great Halloween night (just a couple weeks early).
So, for any of the movies that I have recommended, invite some friends over and watch it together! Yes, enjoy the movie. But, more importantly, enjoy the time with friends and family! If the weather is nice, go outside and make some s'mores over a fire! And, if you are able, watch a movie out there too. It will be an enjoyable and memorable night.
WolfCop is about a deadbeat, alcoholic cop who is turned into a werewolf who goes up against the forces of evil. Because, of course he does.
Looking at the cover of WolfCop, and the fact that the name of the freaking movie is WolfCop, I expected things to be absolutely ridiculous and fun all the way through. With a name like WolfCop, how could there even be a thought of something serious?? When the werewolf cop finally takes on the persona of WolfCop and gets into the action, the movie was a lot of fun to watch! Unfortunately, it takes about half the movie until it finally gets to a point where I'm having fun.
There were many shortcomings in WolfCop that kept it from being fun right from the start. Rather than a smart wink and a not to stereotypes of sci-fi, action, supernatural, etc. movies, this feels more like it was written by someone who has never actually seen a movie with the stereotypes they are based on. There is cursing at weird moments, feeling more like they are throwing it in just to have cursing. The dialogue is absolutely terrible (that's not really a surprise though). Any explanation at a plot is so blunt and straightforward without any nuance - it is just lazy writing. There isn't really any character growth. There are unexplained character changes, like the uptight brunette who always has her hair up and glasses on who all of a sudden is "cool" with her hair down and glasses off, but no real growth or development. There were attempts to have twists and surprises, but there were no surprises or big reveals in the actual plot - it was all pretty much what you can guess in the first five minutes.
Of all of these shortcomings, the biggest one was that there was too much time spent on trying to develop a plot, but no real effort to actually develop it well. A movie like this needs to be just all ridiculous action all the time. If there is not going to be a well-developed story that makes me care about the characters, then don't slow down the ridiculous action with a pointless story. They could have easily spent 10 minutes setting up the story and then the next hour with WolfCop doing crazy WolfCop things.
As much as I hated the first half of the movie, the second half was an absolute blast! The dialogue went from annoyingly inane to enjoyably ridiculous. The scenes of WolfCop taking out the bad guys did not hold much back or leave much to the imagination. There is a sex scene while WolfCop is still Wolf..Cop. The second half of the movie was everything that I expected the entire movie to be.
Rating and Recommendation: 3/5, primarily because of the second half of the movie. Overall, WolfCop wasn't terrible. In fact, it was a lot of fun once it got to the fun. However, any attempt at a story was incredibly weak and the "story" was the biggest thing slowing down the fun. It needed to either be all ridiculous, or actually well-developed. The movie itself was just like the main character. While there is an attempt at a story, it is disappointing and generally a chore to be around. However, once it changes over to WolfCop, break out the liquor and the donuts, cause it's a party! Overall, I enjoyed it enough to watch it again. However, any repeated viewings will start about halfway through, when all of the fun starts. And that's my recommendation. Start the movie at 34:35. That will give you enough explanation as to what has happened and what is going to happen in the movie. If you just want to watch from when the fun starts, start at 39:46 (right before he changes into WolfCop).
Side note: There is a store in the movie called "liquor donuts." Only in Canada...
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
The Monkey's Paw is based on a short story of the same name, in which the possessor of the monkey's paw is granted three wishes, but with dark and twisted consequences. Specifically (spoilers), when Jake's friend Cobb dies in a car wreck, Jake wishes that Cobb was still alive. Cobb does come back to life, but it is more of just a reanimated shell of a human as Cobb returns with no soul.
The Monkey's Paw is loosely based on the original story and is even referenced in the a story that is told to explain how a character came to be in possession of the cursed totem. In the original story, a young man dies during war and the parents wish that their son was still alive. The son does come back to life, but it is still the same broken, mangled body that was left after the damage of war. The grotesque figure was no longer at rest, but in constant agony. I remember seeing a stage production of The Monkey's Paw when I was in middle school. At the time, I remember thinking that the story was terrifying! The main reason that I found it so terrifying and intriguing was because they never actually showed the son's reanimated body. There were sounds and shadows to help set the scene, but my mind had to fill in the blanks. In this movie, Cobb returns mostly intact (at least, physically). While he still returns as a monster, the film version has the monstrosity on the inside, rather than the outside. Sometimes, this can work very well as it drums up more fears about the monster inside. However, I think that it fell short in this movie. Since I remembered what my mind created when I pictured the grotesque, disfigured body in the stage production, the movie failed to live up to my early imagination.
Another reason that I think having the monster on the inside did not quite work was because the protagonist of the film is Jake, a co-worker and friend of Cobb. While there is nothing inherently wrong about a friend/co-worker relationship being the primary relationship, Jake was not exactly the most lovable character. In fact, he was kind of a tool. Since he did a few things early on that made him less likable, it was hard for me to root for him as the movie went on. Cobb, on the other hand, showed complexity early on (albeit through very stereotypical plot devices). Most of Cobb's actions (even after returning from the dead) were driven by a desire to have a closer relationship with his son. If the movie had focused more on that angle and had the son wishing for his father to return, I think that the story could have gone in a much better direction. Cobb works very well as the antagonist, but the rest of the acting fell very flat.
I remembered The Monkey's Paw being much more psychological, which is part of why I enjoy it. The Monkey's Paw disregarded much of the psychological aspects that made the original story so fascinating and, instead, focused on more of a slasher theme. That was the biggest downfall of this movie. Rather than going in depth with the characters and the philosophical implications of being able to receive whatever you wish for, and the inability to ever receive what you think it is you will receive, this movie included too many aspects that felt like they were just there to fill up time in the movie. Also, the ending of the film was neither surprising, nor satisfying.
Rating and Recommendation: 2/5. Like so many movies that I have been watching lately, I really do think that this one had potential and could have easily been much better. But, there were just too many pieces that fell too flat for me. The Monkey's Paw was always about psychological and existential torture/consequences. At times, this movie approached the psychological, but the potential was never actualized. Stephen Lang's performance as Cobb was enjoyable and was one of the only things that made this movie worth watching. However, outside of his performance, nothing about the movie was able to live up to my early experiences with the story. If you do not have any experiences with the short story, then The Monkey's Paw is worth checking out, just to see Lang's portrayal of what would happen to someone if they no longer had a soul. However, if you have a fondness for the original story, this is definitely a pass as it will most likely not meet your expectations.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Frogs is about a freelance photographer (Sam Elliot) doing a photojournalism piece on pollution of a lake. In the middle of the lake is the island estate of a disabled millionaire, who cares little for nature and is the source of most of the pollution. In the days leading up to the millionaire's birthday celebration, the animals start taking revenge for the destruction of nature.
Aside from the overwhelmingly blunt message of "if you pollute, you are evil!!", this movie actually had a decent amount of heart. Maybe it's because it was a small cast and just about everyone (except for Sam Elliot) was family. Since it takes place in the day leading up to the millionaire's birthday, you get to see some of the family interactions, allowing for more of an opportunity to sympathize with (or just despise) them.
Even though seeing the family in a variety of situations allows you to form a closer connection with them, that also works against the movie. I get that the family is using too much pesticides and has been killing too many animals (some through dumping of chemicals and some through hunting for sport), but the family is never really shown as being quite evil enough. Things are shown too quickly, in terms of the actual plot of the animals taking revenge. Rather than actually showing the family do some of the terrible things, the audience is just told about them. The only reason that the audience knows that these people are the antagonists is because we are told that they have been too bad to the environment. While most of the family "deserves" what they have coming to them (again, based primarily on the audience being told that the family deserves it, rather than showing their more heinous acts), there is one old woman who does not seem like she is doing any damage other than just enjoying catching butterflies - and she has probably the most torturous death of the entire movie.
While the family is an ambiguous and underdeveloped antagonist (yes, even though the millionaire grandfather is the primary antagonist, the entire family has played some part in the destruction of the environment), Sam Elliot is very clearly the protagonist and I think that he is a major factor in giving the movie heart. Sam Elliot (probably most notably known for his role as Virgil Earp in Tombstone, though he has an extensive resume) plays the same good-hearted cowboy (though, this time without the hat) that he plays so well. He was one of my favorite things about the movie and his acting kept the movie from straying too far into the horribly cheesy territory. My biggest complaint about his performance is that he did not have a mustache. This is the first time that I have ever seen him without a mustache, and it was weird.
Rating and Recommendation: 2/5. Frogs was fairly standard cult, B-movie fare. There was some good: some things about it were endearingly tropey and/or cheesy, Sam Elliot proves that his cool, collected, cowboy persona were cultivated at an early age, and there is a message with heart (that is overwhelmingly hitting you over the head). There was some bad: we are told how we are supposed to feel about the characters rather than being shown actual evidence, too much footage is used setting the physical setting rather than the emotional tone, and even though the movie is called frogs, they are never actually shown doing any of the killing. But there wasn't anything especially amazing about the good that makes it a must see, nor was there anything especially terrible that makes it an instant pass. It was enjoyable enough and I would be willing to watch it again, but I also won't lose sleep at night if I was told that I would never be able to see it again. If someone took the time to re-edit the movie and cut out a lot of the pointless B-roll of frogs and only show scenes that actually show us anything about the characters, I think that it would actually make a pretty interesting and enjoyable episode of something like Twilight Zone or Outer Limits. But, as it is, Frogs falls short and lands itself in "pass" territory.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Escape from Tomorrow (2013)
not rated
Netflix instant
Escape from Tomorrow is about a family that takes their two young children to "the happiest place on Earth." While on their vacation, the father finds out that he has lost his job, he becomes increasingly irritated at his wife, and he becomes entangled in his own fantasies about two girls/young women also at the theme park. The "happiest place on Earth" starts to become the most paranoid place on Earth as the father loses his grip on reality.
The music and setting starts out feeling very much like the beginning of a Disney movie. That feeling does not last long, as someone gets decapitated on a roller coaster. It is not excessively gruesome, but you do see the head come off and it is definitely not expected! I do not know how intentional it was, but I like the symbolism of the guy at the beginning of the movie representing how the main character "loses his head" at Disney.
Some of the things that happen while they are on rides start looking creepy to the dude and the film being in black and white adds to the creepy feel. Some of the effects that are done are very simple, but they still work in setting the creepy tone. Plus, the music does a good job of setting the appropriate tone throughout the film.
There is a disclaimer at the beginning of the movie saying that Disney had nothing to do with the making of the film. I wonder how much of what they filmed was done with permission, how much of it was replicated, and how much of it was filmed illegally. Some scenes are obviously filmed in front of a green screen, but there are other scenes that look like they were actually filmed at the park. Even though the disclaimer at the beginning says that it is a work of fiction, the book that I use to teach my abnormal psychology course has a story about a guy who does go through a psychotic episode at Disney.
Along with the implications of the guy following the young women/girls and nudity, there is also a weird sex scene. There isn't actually any nudity during the scene, but the woman is wearing a necklace and the necklace keeps hitting the guy in the face. The sex scene takes place after there have been several scenes showing his declining grip on reality, so I do question whether or not the sex actually took place or if it was just in his head.
Rating and Recommendation: 2.5/5. Worth checking out, but you won't be missing too much if you pass. Escape from Tomorrow is ambitious and, at times, it works very well. However, sometimes the ambition outweighs the execution, leaving the film feeling unfinished and not fully thought out. I really like how things started out and I thought that it had a lot of potential to be a really cool indie movie about a guy slowly losing his mind. But, towards the end of the film, they started throwing too much into it. "He's crazy. No, it's the flu. No, it's a secret Disney plot. No, she's a witch. No, it's like the Shining..." If they had just stuck with one thing, it could have been really awesome. Or, if they had just made things a little more clear, it could have worked. I did find it to have some very interesting aspects and I would be interested in watching it again with a group of friends so that we could have a more in-depth discussion about it afterwards. But, I don't know if I necessarily see myself watching it on my own again anytime in the near future. If just a few things had been different, I would say that this one is definitely worth checking out. But, unfortunately this falls short of being a must see.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Ghoulies go to College (a.k.a. Ghoulies III) (1991)
R
The ancient toilet demons return, this time brought to life by a college dean. Of course, the ghoulies are brought back during college prank week, so all of their shenanigans are believed to be the result of campus fraternities.
I have not seen the first two Ghoulies movies, so I have nothing to compare this one to. However, I do know that it is about demonic creatures that come from the toilet, so I had a decent idea of what I was getting myself into. However, just because I knew what I was getting into, that does not necessarily mean that I enjoyed it.
There really isn't much to say about Ghoulies go to College. The entire movie is a schlocky, pun-filled, early 90s college movie with slapstick humor, sound effects that are worse than a cartoon, swearing, nudity, and cheesy acting. The Ghoulies movies came out around the same time as Critters and Gremlins, with the sequels all coming out around the same time as well. I really enjoy Critters and Gremlins, so I was hoping that Ghoulies would be just as fun. Instead, it feels like someone said "I want a Gremlins knock-off, but with none of the heart. And poop jokes. More poop jokes. Nope...still more poop jokes."
Rating and Recommendation: 1.5/5. Ghoulies go to College was pretty stupid, but with just enough bits to where I can see how some people would consider it a cult film. Since I hadn't seen the first two Ghoulies movies, I did not have any sort of connection to, or fondness of, the characters. Maybe if I had seen them when I was younger and all the "cool" jokes were poop jokes, I might have enjoyed it more. As it is, I think that it could be a lot of fun for watching a really stupid movie with some friends, but other than that you can easily pass this one without really missing anything.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Hellgate starts with a group of college students in a cabin outside of town (not quite a "cabin in the woods") who are telling ghost stories to each other. One of the stories told is a local legend about a girl who was killed by a motorcycle gang. The girl is the daughter of the owner of a ghost town tourist stop. The grieving father comes to poses a magical crystal that can bring things back to life, the power of which also fuels his lust for vengeance.
Hellgate is a terrible movie, but it is the kind of terrible that is a lot of fun to watch. There are ghost stories, a cabin in the woods, supernatural forces, the dead being raised, bikers, a demon fish created by the crystal, zombies, possessions. It is like they took all of the possible horror movies and turned it into a game to see how many they could cram into one. At times, all of the pieces actually almost work together. At other times, it just feels like there are too many things going on at once without any focus.
Along with being a goulash of horror genres, there are also some very awkward sex scenes (and suggestive scenes). Before the girl is killed by the biker gang, they are accosting her in a diner. The cook comes out and shoots a shotgun to get them to leave, but does nothing to try to stop them from taking the girl. Apparently he was fine with whatever they were going to do to her, he just didn't want them doing it in his diner. A girl is smoking during sex, but her face (with the cigarette in it) is in the couch. A girl is naked several times in front of her father. There were a lot of topless scenes, and almost all of them were just super awkward.
The dialogue is cheesy. The acting is cheesy. There are a ton of plot holes and things that do not make sense. At times there are too many things going on without any clear reason as to why/how they are happening. But, overall, it was a fun movie. There is some heart. There is a slight amount of tension. There are some gory scenes, including one of the best demon fish I have ever seen. There is nothing to especially make it stand out or to become an iconic horror movie, but it was a fun little romp leading up to Halloween. Hellgate hits a lot of the right horror notes (scary music, monsters, things jumping out of the shadows, nudity, etc.), but it doesn't hit any of them out of the park. It is kind of like a casserole - it has a lot of things that I like and overall it is not horrible, but it could easily get lost among any number of similar items that do the same or similar thing better.
Rating and Recommendation: 2.5/5. Enjoyable and worth seeing for free. If you are able to add Hellgate to your queue or catch it somewhere like Hulu, I recommend doing so. I would not actually spend money on it, but I enjoyed it enough that I would watch it again if given the opportunity. Reminder - my current rating system is based on how much I enjoyed watching the movie and not necessarily a reflection of the quality of the movie. The enjoyment level of Hellgate was much higher than the quality level.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
The House of the Devil is a relatively simple story. A college girl answers a babysitting add, but once she gets there, things are not exactly as they might seem.
After watching a few bad horror movies in a row, The House of the Devil was a refreshing change of pace. The House of the Devil is set somewhere in the late 70s/early 80s, but unlike most current horror films that are set in the past, this one actually feels like it is from the past. Even the timing, font, and color of the opening and closing credits are done in such a way that I feel like I'm actually watching a classic horror flick from the 80s. The director (Ti West) is clearly paying homage to 70s/80s horror - and he is actually doing them justice! West undoubtedly did his homework in film school.
One of the things I loved so much about this movie (and the thing that made it an incredibly horror movie) is the focus on tension, rather than startles and gore. There is a very slow building tension throughout the movie and, to me, it works! I have said in many of my previous reviews that part of what separates true horror from the rest is that true horror stays with you long after the movie. The horror does not come from just a bunch of things jumping out at you from the shadows, but a deeper and much darker force that plays on real fears. There might be things jumping out at you in a true horror movie, but it is the deeper tone that sets the fear, rather than just the startle.
That deeper fear primarily takes the shape of the fear of the unknown in The House of the Devil. Having seen a lot of horror movies in the past, there are a plethora of little things that really set the tone. The dialogue uses foreshadowing heavily. The camera angles keep you from seeing too far from the characters. Scenes that take place at night are almost pitch black outside of the immediate area. There is very minimal use of "scary" music to let you know when to expect something. There are a lot of subtle musical queues that raise the tension, but at times I did not realize how long the music had been building. Even down to details like a lamp casting a shadow which looks like someone hanging, this movie is wrought with tension.
While I think that the tension and the attention to detail are part of what make The House of the Devil so amazing, they could also be the very reasons that some people might not enjoy it. As I've said, this movie does justice to classic horror movies. But, if someone has not seen many horror movies and does not know some of the tricks and techniques, it will not have the same impact. Also, if this is a movie that you put on in the background and only somewhat pay attention to, it will not have nearly the same effect in regards to raising the tension.
Rating and Recommendation: 4/5. This movie is definitely a must see! If you are a fan of horror, the sense of suspense that builds throughout the film is almost palpable. You know the Oscar Wilde quote "the suspense is terrible. I hope it will last!"?? Well, I am going to modify it slightly to describe The House of the Devil - "the suspense is terrible, it's hard to sustain!!!...but in the most satisfying way possible." Even if you disregard the horror aspect, I think that The House of the Devil is just an incredibly well done movie. I feel as though West was clearly inspired by the likes of Kubrick and Carpenter, but without feeling like he was just sloppily rehashing their techniques. The House of the Devil is only available on Netflix instant until 10/15, so be sure to watch it before it goes away!
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other) review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
Deadheads is about a zombie outbreak, but where two zombies retain most of their humanity...except for the whole being alive thing. The two zombies team up and go on a road trip so that one of them can win back his love from when he was alive.
Deadheads was described as a horror comedy with romance. Unfortunately, it failed to live up to any of those descriptions. The biggest problem was that everything felt too forced. There was an homage to Dawn of the Dead, but it was a little too on the nose (especially since the cop on the phone was actually talking about Dawn of the Dead). The comedy was a bit too slapstick and too vulgar. I certainly don't have anything against vulgar humor, when it is actually humorous. But, a lot of the "humor" felt too much like "we are being vulgar...isn't that funny?!!?"
The "buddy comedy" angle was forced too quick. The music was too "comedic" and too persistent. There was not enough to actually show the love story - it felt so empty. Practically every aspect of the movie took me further out of it, rather than bringing me more into it. Nothing is actually done to establish any real emotions. The audience is told what they are supposed to feel, but there is nothing behind it to actually make the audience feel anything. There was one scene that had some actual emotion, but even that felt too forced and too out of place.
Rating and Recommendation: 2/5. Like too many of the movies that I have seen recently, it's not that this movie was necessarily horrible...it's just that there was too much potential that was left unfulfilled. If they had just gone with a romantic comedy, it might have been ok. As it is, they tried too hard to also make the zombie funny and I do not think that it worked at all. If they had just spent a little more time on developing any of the various aspects of the movie, it could have been more enjoyable. As it was, I didn't care about any of the characters. I wasn't scared. I didn't laugh. Essentially, the "horror comedy with romance" was none of those things. If you want a zombie comedy, just stick with Shaun of the Dead. Then, watch Shaun of the Dead again. Seriously, it's awesome.
Be sure to check back soon for more reviews in Halloween
Movie Month! In the meantime, leave comments on this (or any other)
review, follow me here and on twitter (@GargyleReviews), and let me know
what movies you'd like for me to review for Halloween Movie Month!
